May 5 – 9, 2025
STELLENBOSCH, CAPE TOWN, SOUTH AFRICA
Africa/Johannesburg timezone

Welcome to IAA Conferences Portal

Novel Reutilization of the European Service Module in Service of Planetary Defense

May 8, 2025, 11:53 AM
8m
STELLENBOSCH, CAPE TOWN, SOUTH AFRICA

STELLENBOSCH, CAPE TOWN, SOUTH AFRICA

Protea Hotel by Marriott® Stellenbosch
Oral. Space Mission & Campaign Design Session 7: Space Mission & Campaign Design

Speaker

Lorraine Fesq (JPL/Caltech)

Description

The lessons of reusing and repurposing mission assets are relevant to Planetary Defense and Small Body Science objectives, as expressed in the most recent decadal survey for Planetary Science and Astrobiology. As described in [1], the European Service Module (ESM), the element of NASA’s Artemis Program that returns the Orion Crew Module to Earth (Figure), currently is planned for destruction by burning up in the Earth’s atmosphere. However, the ESM is a capable spacecraft, complete with propulsion, attitude control, power generation/conditioning/distribution, thermal control, and payload support. By leveraging the remaining propulsive capabilities, post separation, it has the potential to provide a near term method, on a yearly cadence, at a reduced cost, for achieving science return across an array of mission types.

JPL hosted a scientific workshop in summer 2024, with US and European participants, to discuss potential ESM extended mission targets. The participants jointly assessed the benefits that could be derived from repurposing the ESM for scientific use after completing its primary mission. The participants generated over thirty concepts that offered significant value in areas such as planetary defense, planetary science, the exploration of Near-Earth Objects (NEOs), and cosmology. For example, there are many unexplored classes of near-Earth and main belt asteroids that could be reached with the ESM after its primary mission. Some of these bodies are associated with water (e.g., 24 Themis), others with metals (e.g., 216 Kleopatra), and others imply impact hazards. The ESM, in principle, can tour several diverse asteroids and possibly carry a small NEO sample return spacecraft [2], rapidly accelerating our understanding of these worlds. Another concept highlighted the capability to use the ESM as a large kinetic impactor, sending it to impact a suitable NEO. ESM has a dry mass seven times larger than the spacecraft used on the successful DART mission.

The ESM currently relies on the Crew Module for several functions including communications, computing, and attitude control sensors; thus, several spacecraft functions would need to be added. Also, ESM mass margins would allow accommodation of a scientific payload, opening the possibility to expand the prime mission for additional science objectives. The concepts considered were divided into augmentation categories of no augmentation (impactors), minimal augmentation (flybys), and low-to-moderate augmentation (orbiters, landers).

The highest priority for each ESM mission is to accomplish the primary mission objectives within the Artemis program. Although the ESM has the potential to deliver additional scientific value beyond its current scope, the scientific value added will have to be weighed against programmatic considerations and carefully analyzed within the ESM's programmatic framework and its stakeholders. Acknowledging this, we explore the possibilities to achieve tantalizing science objectives at a lower-cost.

Author

Lorraine Fesq (JPL/Caltech)

Co-authors

Carol Raymond (Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology) Dr Christian Renggli (Max Planck Institute for Solar System Research) Dr David Bearden (JPL/Caltech) Dr James Keane (JPL/Caltech) Dr Jean-Baptiste Vincent (DLR Institute of Planetary Research) Dr Jennifer Scully (JPL/Caltech) Dr Kai Wünnemann (Museum für Naturkunde – Leibniz-Institute for Evolution and Biodiversity Science) Dr Matthias Grott (DLR Institute of Planetary Research) Dr Matthias Winter (Airbus Defence and Space GmbH) Dr Norbert Krupp (Max Planck Institute for Solar System Research) Dr Robert Luther (Museum für Naturkunde – Leibniz-Institute for Evolution and Biodiversity Science) Stephan Ulamec (DLR) Thorsten Kleine (MPS Göttingen) Dr William Bottke (Southwest Research Institute)

Presentation materials