Speakers
Description
Keywords: asteroid flyby, asteroid reconnaissance, mass estimation, mass uncertainty
The near-Earth object (NEO) discovery rate has increased in recent years, and the discovery rate is expected to further increase dramatically when new telescope systems such as LSST and NEO Surveyor come online during the next several years. Significant increases in NEO discovery rate makes it more and more likely that an asteroid on an Earth-impacting orbit will be discovered during the next decade. Accurately estimating the mass of Earth impacting asteroids is essential for predicting potential Earth impact effects and designing spacecraft missions to prevent Earth impacts. However, asteroid mass estimates are often clouded with significant uncertainties if the asteroid is only observed by ground-based telescopes. The quickest way to reduce these uncertainties is to send a fast flyby
spacecraft mission to reconnoiter the asteroid. Directly measuring asteroid mass with a fast flyby mission is very difficult, but capturing camera images of the asteroid is relatively straightforward. Spacecraft
camera images of the asteroid can be used to build a shape model of the asteroid using techniques such as stereophotoclinometry, and that shape model yields an estimate of the asteroid’s volume and associated uncertainty. However, without additional measurements or a priori constraints, significant uncertainties remain in the asteroid’s base material density and bulk porosity (or, taken together, bulk density).
Asteroid mass can be described as the product function ( f ) of volume, base material density, and bulk porosity, and an expression can be derived relating percent uncertainty in f to the uncertainty in f ’s dependent variables. Asteroid volume uncertainty can be significantly reduced by an appropriately designed flyby mission [1]. Table 1 lists previous missions where spacecraft flyby improved knowledge of the visited asteroids. This begs the question ”Given a particular volume uncertainty from processing spacecraft camera images of an asteroid, what are the required a priori uncertainties in bulk porosity and
base material density to keep the resulting mass uncertainty below a particular level?”.
In this study, we explore the interconnected nature of these uncertainties and estimate the lowest asteroid mass uncertainties achievable when only volume measurements are available, based on current abilities to constrain asteroid density and porosity. We also discuss how low the uncertainties on asteroid density and porosity would need to be in order to achieve given levels of asteroid mass uncertainty utilizing only camera imagery collected by fast flyby reconnaissance missions.
The equations and relationships that will be presented can be used to inform asteroid flyby reconnaissance mission design and instrument selection, as they give an indication of the instrument precision and resolution required to achieve a desired goal in asteroid mass uncertainty. Mission implications from a space-systems perspective are explored, helping to inform mission requirements and performance expectations for a given set of estimated asteroid parameters.
References
[1] [2] [3] P. C. Thomas et al., “Eros: Shape, topography, and slope processes,” Icarus, vol. 155, pp. 18–37, Jan. 2002.
J. Veverka et al., “NEAR encounter with asteroid 253 mathilde: Overview,” Icarus, vol. 140, pp. 3–16, Jul. 1999.
D. K. Yeomans et al., “Radio science results during the NEAR-shoemaker spacecraft rendezvous with eros,” Science, vol. 289,
pp. 2085–2088, Sept. 2000.
[4] J. Veverka et al., “Imaging of Asteroid 433 Eros During NEAR’s Flyby Reconnaissance,” Science, vol. 285, pp. 562–4, Aug.
1999.
[5] L. Jorda et al., “Asteroid (2867) Steins: Shape, topography and global physical properties from OSIRIS observations,” Icarus,
vol. 221, pp. 1089–1100, Nov. 2012.
[6] [7] M.F. A’Hearn et al., “EPOXI at Comet Hartley 2,” Science, vol. 332, pp. 1396–1400, Jun. 2011.
P.C. Thomas et al., “Shape, density, and geology of the nucleus of Comet 103P/Hartley 2,” Icarus, vol. 222, pp. 550–558, Feb.
2013.
[8] J. T. Keane et al., “The Geophysical Environment of (486958) Arrokoth—A Small Kuiper Belt Object Explored by New Hori-
zons,” Journal of Geophysical Research: Planets, vol. 127, May 2022.